flexagon: (humans...)
flexagon ([personal profile] flexagon) wrote2016-10-15 09:25 pm

Would YOU pass along a friend-of-friend to the rest of your friends?

I had a somewhat fascinating conversation this week about the limits of friend-favors and social networks. It was a conversation with my friend RF, and it took place in the context of this linear social network. All connections are social connections but all parties are in the same industry:

JI -- RF -- DY -- (DY's other friends)

And the paraphrased conversation was like this.

RF: (was angry that DY wouldn't introduce JI to her friends in a certain industry segment, after saying she might or would.)
Me: Hmm, how sad, DY is not doing unpaid labor quite as you'd hoped. Maybe you should hook JI up with a headhunter, who does this stuff for a living.
RF: Whaaa? That's a little bit mean. JI isn't even looking for a job, she just wants to make connections.
Me: Wow, so even less potential payoff for DY. Yeah, I can't say that's my scene either. Too much effort, no reward.
RF: I feel it's not about effort, but about DY not wanting to look stupid in front of her friends in case JI isn't very smart.
Me: I, also, would not wish to risk even a smidge of my professional reputation on referring someone I had not met.
RF: Here is the letter JI wrote about what she was looking for. (Letter).
Me: Yeah, I wouldn't pass that along to my friends either. I really, really, wouldn't. No way. That letter makes JI look like a whole lot of work.

We talked some more, and it became clear that, for me and maybe for DY, that extra degree of social separation is an absolute killer. I would personally have talked to JI, as a favor, in DY's place, but without having met her there is no way I'd risk annoying the rest of my professional-friend network.

Likewise, I'm pretty sure I would not meet up with a friend of a friend of a friend. There's too little linkage there. A FoF who turns out to be annoying can be restrained a bit through the friend in the middle, but beyond that it's no better than a random stranger. And I have to focus my energy/time somehow. And my professional reputation is precious, and has taken me a long time to earn.

RF would have made the introductions, though. He would have seen it as a reasonable friend-favor, and would not have seen it as a risk to his professional reputation to pass on an unknown to his friends. That last point interests me, because I don't see why we would differ on that point; could be a gender thing, or a confidence thing (correlated), or something else I'm not seeing.

Would you have done it?

[identity profile] apfelsingail.livejournal.com 2016-10-16 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Hah. As someone who is really focusing a lot on networking and sales, and asking people to help me to get to know more people, I've been thinking about this a lot lately.

I don't see this as a binary yes/no. It would really depend.

One degree, sure.

I would want to at least chat a bit with a two degree before I considered passing them on. I might well also add a low-grade disclaimer so it's clear whether or not it's someone I am vouching for- 'hey, this acquaintance is interested in X; don't know him/her terribly well/haven't actually worked with him directly, but she seems like she might be interesting to talk to.'

If they annoyed me or I didn't see some possible value to passing them on to BOTH parties, I'm not going to do it. I'm not going to casually waste the time of my connections. That's definitely a reputation risk.

I also factor in who they want to talk to- if it's someone I consider to be professionally very high-value (i.e., someone who gets asked for things a lot, because they have control over resources), I'm not going to do it unless I am reasonably confident it will be helpful to that person. I mean, I try to do that for everyone, but there are people I am super careful with.

There is the professional reputation issue, but there is also something to be said for paying it forward in networking as well. I guess I actually visualize those relationships as less linear and more, hm, almost radial? Or at least branching and multi-layered.

[identity profile] apfelsingail.livejournal.com 2016-10-17 12:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, you're definitely shaped by that- but if you let it, you could easily spend all your time talking to people about Life At Zillian.