flexagon: (Default)
[personal profile] flexagon
Just finished a good, though ultimately depressing, book about Chang and Eng -- the conjoined twins from Siam who became so famous that people now say Siamese twins when babies are born conjoined. It was fascinating, not least because the brothers could be so different at times. But one of the most darkly humorous parts of the book had nothing to do with the main theme: a description of an all-female Southern temperance group listening to a speech about the evils of drinking alcohol while drinking opium tea. The humor was so deadpan that the scene was completely convincing. And sure enough, some googling and reading shows that opium tea was indeed a common thing in the South around the time of the Civil war:

During the Civil War, gardeners in the South were encouraged to plant opium for the war effort, in order to ensure a supply of painkillers for the Confederate Army.

It's worth noting that during the period of anti-alcohol hysteria that led to Prohibition, certain forms of opium were as legal and almost as widely available in this country as alcohol is today. It is said that members of the Women's Christian Temperance Union would relax at the end of a day spent crusading against alcohol with their cherished "women's tonics," preparations whose active ingredient was laudanum--opium. Such was the order of things less than a century ago.

Both quotes are from this interesting article in Harper's. I read pretty much to the end before realizing it was by the author of The Botany of Desire, which was high on my Christmas-giving list a few years ago. It really is fascinating and weird how differently society can treat different ingestable substances... I used to draw a distinct line between some substances and others, but those days ended when I started learning more about nutrition and decided pretty much everything is a drug. Especially sugar.

Date: 2005-09-13 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hiddenbear.livejournal.com
Damn it LJ! I had a whole comment written and it got eaten! And I had copied it before hitting 'Post Comment', but even that didn't work!!! Would anyone blame me for wondering whether the fact that my comment was anti-government had anything to do with it getting eaten?!?

Anyway, it basically said that I wasn't going to admit to having read the article. I may have. I may not have. I may wish to plant Poppies at some time in my life. I may not wish to do so.

However, the seizure of property without a conviction is an extremely scary law.
The classification of flowers as illicit is a ridiculous law.
And our whole government's drug war is expensive, unfruitful, and, and, and mean.

My other comment was much better written. :-(

Profile

flexagon: (Default)
flexagon

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 08:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios