Sep. 3rd, 2009

flexagon: (Default)
On the train today I was pondering how the English language could really use two different words for two usages of the word "my". There's the possessive my (my purse, my bagel), and then there's the "associated with me" my (my company, my train, my husband) where I definitely don't own or control the thing in question. There are more, but these seem like the two that are most in need of separation.

I have no idea how my hypothetical language change would handle things that one partly owns or partly controls.

My cat: I own her under the law, but she also has legal rights to humane treatment, and I think of her as more than a possession.
My condo: I own half of it at most, and that's joint ownership with [livejournal.com profile] heisenbug involved, the bank owns the rest.

Is this even interesting? It seems kind of unactionable. There are ways to protest the use of a word, or the misuse, but there's not much people can practically do to promote a pair of new words to replace one word. :P Also, I love wordplay... I am exactly the kind of person who's interested enough in ideas about clarity of language (computer languages, Esperanto, even E-prime) but then goes home to do cryptic crosswords.

Maybe I'll do some constrained writing soon.

Profile

flexagon: (Default)
flexagon

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2025 09:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios